Case 1600718/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Cox v Cardiff Fabrication and Welding Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600718/2022
- Decision date
- 14 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Cox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cardiff on 11 November 2022 before Employment Judge S Jenkins. The claimant, Mr R Cox, was represented by counsel; the respondent did not appear or provide representation. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and recorded that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claims for unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unauthorised deductions from wages, and payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday. Those claims were dismissed because they were not brought within the stipulated time limits.
The claimant’s claim for a statutory redundancy payment succeeded. The tribunal ordered Cardiff Fabrication and Welding Limited to pay Mr Cox £14,250.00 in respect of that claim.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claim was not brought within the stipulated time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the claim was not brought within the stipulated time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claim was not brought within the stipulated time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday dismissed because it was not brought within the stipulated time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay £14,250.00. | Upheld | — | £14,250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.