Case 1600720/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D P Davies v Grangetown Conservative Club — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600720/2019
- Decision date
- 30 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D P Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace gave judgment on 16 December 2019 in the absence of an ET3 response form from Grangetown Conservative Club. The tribunal said there was sufficient material before it to make a proper determination and proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's notice pay claim in the sum of £3,288.60. It also upheld the redundancy payment claim in the sum of £4,932.90. The total award was £8,221.50.
The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. No separate breakdown of the award beyond the two upheld heads of claim is given in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this head as 'Notice Pay'; it has been mapped to breach of contract as the closest claim type in the locked taxonomy. | Upheld | — | £3,289 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,933 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,222
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.