Case 1600728/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Parsons v Penclawdd Shellfish Processing Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600728/2019
- Decision date
- 15 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Parsons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Moore determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent did not present an ET3 response form. The judgment records that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination on that basis.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for notice pay in the sum of £1,728. It also upheld the claim for statutory redundancy pay in the sum of £2,592, and the holiday claim in the sum of £612.
The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. No further reasons, liability analysis, or separate remedy breakdown beyond the three awards were recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Judgment labels this award as 'Notice Pay'. | Upheld | — | £1,728 |
| Redundancy | Judgment labels this award as 'Statutory Redundancy Pay'. | Upheld | — | £2,592 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment labels this award as 'Holiday'. | Upheld | — | £612 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,932
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.