Case 1600729/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Williams v The Design Build Company (North West) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600729/2023
- Decision date
- 21 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr P Williams, brought claims against The Design Build Company (North West) Ltd. The respondent was absent and had filed no response. The case was heard at Wrexham by CVP on 7 August 2023 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims were well-founded and succeeded. It awarded redundancy pay of £1,713, describing this as the corrected sum after an incorrect figure had been stated in the oral judgment and later checked on the Tribunal's own initiative. It also found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages in the sum of £2,640, subject to tax and NI.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay due on termination of employment, awarding £840, subject to tax and NI. The stated total was £5,193, subject to statutory deductions where shown. Written reasons were not provided because the judgment had been given orally and no request for reasons was made at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records that this is the corrected sum, after an incorrect sum had been stated in the oral judgment and checked on the Tribunal's own initiative. | Upheld | — | £1,713 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded subject to tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £2,640 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay due on termination of employment; awarded subject to tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £840 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,193
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.