Case 1600730/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Dr H Hunt v Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board HELD AT/BY: Wrexham by CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600730/2022
- Decision date
- 19 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr H Hunt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with Dr H Hunt's application of 1 February 2024 to amend his claim. At the hearing on 18 March 2024 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, the application was granted for paragraphs 59.d-f of the Amended Particulars of Claim and refused for paragraph 59.g, which was described as the claim for pay in relation to adoption leave.
The decision also confirmed the case management orders made by Employment Judge Harris on 18 January 2024 and suggested that the parties try to agree a joint agenda for the preliminary hearing listed for 29 April 2024 and a preparatory timetable for the final hearing. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally and no request for written reasons was made at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal decided an application to amend the Amended Particulars of Claim. It granted permission for paragraphs 59.d-f and refused paragraph 59.g, which was described as the claim for pay in relation to adoption leave. No substantive merits determination was made in this decision. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.