Case 1600735/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P James & Others (see schedule) v UNICLAD LIMITED (In Compulsory Liquidation) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600735/2021
- Decision date
- 25 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp JUDGMENT
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P James & Others (see schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe first respondent, Uniclad Limited, was in compulsory liquidation. The tribunal recorded that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 14 June 2022 to provide written reasons within 14 days why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason. The claim against the first respondent was therefore struck out, while the claim against the second respondent continues.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the specific substantive causes of action in the claim. It struck out the claim against the first respondent only; the claim against the second respondent continues. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.