Case 1600735/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Nia Hogarth v Menter Celyn Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600735/2023
- Decision date
- 22 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Macdonald Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Nia Hogarth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Nia Hogarth brought a complaint of unlawful deductions from wages against Menter Celyn Ltd. The case was heard at Cardiff Employment Tribunal by video link on 18 August 2023 before Employment Judge E Macdonald.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unlawful deductions from wages pursuant to s 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded. No other claims or issues are recorded in the written judgment extract.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,016.18 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unlawful deductions from wages under s 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and ordered payment of £2,016.18 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,016 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,016
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.