Case 1600749/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Parsons v Enable Care Services (South Wales) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600749/2022
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Parsons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out the claim. By a letter dated 10 November 2022, the Tribunal gave Miss S Parsons an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with paragraph 3 of the Case Management Order dated 28 October 2022 and because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The preliminary hearing listed for 6 December 2022 was cancelled as a result.
The judgment does not set out any determination on the merits of the underlying claims and does not identify the individual heads of claim in the reasons section. It records only the strike-out decision and the procedural basis for it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action; it states only that "the claim is struck out" because the claimant did not comply with paragraph 3 of the Case Management Order dated 28 October 2022 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.