Case 1600752/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J M Panes v Bug Security and Care Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600752/2021
- Decision date
- 13 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J M Panes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr J. M. Panes was an employee of Bug Security and Care Limited throughout his period of work for the respondent, from 8 February 2019 to 2 March 2021. On that basis, it went on to determine his monetary claims arising out of the employment relationship.
It held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by fining the claimant, and ordered the respondent to pay £185, being the total deducted. The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to allow the claimant to take annual leave in line with the Working Time Regulations.
For that Working Time Regulations breach, the tribunal ordered compensation of £4,610.69. No further reasons, tests, or separate remedy components were set out in the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages by fining the claimant and ordered repayment of the total deducted sum. | Upheld | — | £185 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to allow the claimant to take annual leave in line with the Working Time Regulations and awarded compensation of £4,610.69. | Upheld | — | £4,611 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,796
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.