Case 1600757/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Daniel Blackwell v Corinthian Access Limited (In Receivership) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600757/2024
- Decision date
- 16 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Daniel Blackwell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment determined on the papers by Employment Judge S Moore on 13 September 2024, the respondent (in receivership) having failed to present a valid response on time. The Judge decided a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages (£672.00 gross), that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice (£960.00 damages, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay), that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment (£720.00), and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement (£278.40 gross).
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,630.40 in total. The judgment does not break the total into basic/compensatory/interest components; the figure is the sum of the four heads above.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages; £672.00 gross awarded. | Upheld | — | £672 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; £960.00 damages calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £960 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed by reason of redundancy; entitled to a redundancy payment of £720.00. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement; £278.40 gross awarded. Listing categorised this under Working Time Regulations; the judgment frames it as unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £278 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,630
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.