Case 1600758/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Smith v Local Home Services Ltd HELD AT/BY: Wrexham by CVP — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600758/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr A Smith, brought claims against Local Home Services Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay. The respondent did not file a response and was absent from the hearing, which was held by CVP at Wrexham before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan on 24 October 2023.
The Tribunal found the claims well-founded. It held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages throughout his employment between 22 November 2022 and 17 February 2023, totalling £3,276.39 gross, and had failed to pay him holiday pay of £595.00 gross for 7 days accrued but untaken holiday as at 17 February 2023.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £3,871.39 in unpaid wages and holiday pay, subject to the usual statutory deductions for tax and National Insurance. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages throughout employment from 22 November 2022 to 17 February 2023, amounting to £3,276.39 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,276 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay holiday pay due for 7 days accrued but untaken holiday as at 17 February 2023, amounting to £595.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £595 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,871
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.