Case 1600767/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Morgan and Miss Emma Jeffries v Oyster Bay Systems Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600767/2021
- Decision date
- 8 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Morgan and Miss Emma Jeffries
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with case numbers 1600767/2021 and 1600768/2021 together. By letter dated 19 January 2022, it invited the parties to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out because it would be an abuse of process to allow the cases to continue.
The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim and recorded that the hearing listed for 4 March 2022 would not take place.
The judgment does not identify the substantive legal basis of the underlying claim(s), does not record any hearing on the merits, and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. The tribunal struck out the claim(s) after the respondent failed to make sufficient representations, or any written representations, in response to the Tribunal's letter of 19 January 2022, which said it would be an abuse of process to allow the cases to continue. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.