Case 1600769/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Almore v Blueprint Life Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600769/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Almore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting under Rule 21, determined claims brought by Mr D Almore against Blueprint Life Limited in case numbers 1600769/2019 and 1601494/2019. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,905.30.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £625.05 gross. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £978.82 gross. The hearing listed for 12 November 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of a gross sum of £2,905.30. | Upheld | — | £2,905 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £625.05 gross. | Upheld | — | £625 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £978.82 gross. | Upheld | — | £979 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,509
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.