Case 1600770/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R. Williams v Mrs. J. Bailey and Mrs D. Gittins — 2017
- Case reference
- 1600770/2016
- Decision date
- 21 August 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R. Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew her application to amend her claims to include disability discrimination. Any disability discrimination claims intimated in the claim form were also treated as withdrawn. By agreement of the parties, those claims were not dismissed. The tribunal stated that no further action was to be taken because the claimant might pursue such claims in an alternative jurisdiction, and the case file would be closed.
The claimant's claims that the respondents discriminated against her because of nationality and/or ethnic origin, stated by her as Filipino, were found not well-founded and dismissed. The judgment does not record any award of compensation or other remedy in relation to those claims.
The claimant also advanced a breach of contract claim based on an alleged repudiatory breach and breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. The tribunal found that the respondent did not breach the claimant's contract in a fundamental particular, held that the alleged repudiatory breach was not well-founded, and dismissed the claim. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant withdrew her application to amend to include disability discrimination claims; any such claims intimated in the claim form were also withdrawn. By agreement of the parties, those claims were not dismissed, no further action was to be taken by the tribunal, and the claimant was said to remain free to pursue them in an alternative jurisdiction. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment describes these as claims of discrimination because of nationality and/or ethnic origin, stated by the claimant as Filipino. They were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent did not breach the claimant's contract in a fundamental particular. The claim that there had been a repudiatory breach by breach of the implied term of trust and confidence was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.