Case 1600773/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K. McHale (C1) Mrs F. Holland (C2) v Cefn Druids Football Club Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600773/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K. McHale (C1) Mrs F. Holland (C2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs McHale (C1) was found to have been employed by the respondent from 12 October 2017 until her dismissal on 3 December 2019, and the tribunal held that she was entitled to bring an unfair dismissal claim. It found that she was unfairly dismissed on 3 December 2019 and awarded her a basic award of £246.30 and a compensatory award of £82.10 for loss of statutory protection. The tribunal noted that there was no claim for loss of earnings and that recoupment of benefits did not apply.
The tribunal also found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from C1's wages because three weeks' wages were unpaid. It held that the respondent breached C1's contract by terminating employment without due notice and failed to provide her with a written statement of employment particulars. The awards for those findings were £246.30, £164.20 and £164.20 respectively, making C1's total award £903.10.
Mrs Holland (C2) was found to have been employed from 14 January 2018 until her dismissal on 3 December 2019, but the tribunal held that she was not entitled to claim unfair dismissal because she had less than two years' continuous employment. Her unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed because the tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction. The tribunal nevertheless found unauthorised deductions from her wages, a breach of contract for termination without due notice, and a failure to provide written employment particulars, awarding £246.30, £82.10 and £164.20 respectively, making C2's total award £492.60.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | C1 (Mrs McHale). The tribunal found she was unfairly dismissed on 3 December 2019 and awarded a basic award of £246.30 plus a compensatory award of £82.10 for loss of statutory protection. | Upheld | — | £328 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | C1 (Mrs McHale). The tribunal found unauthorised deductions because three weeks' wages were unpaid. | Upheld | — | £246 |
| Breach of contract | C1 (Mrs McHale). The tribunal found the respondent breached the contract by terminating employment without due notice. | Upheld | — | £164 |
| Other | C1 (Mrs McHale). The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £164 |
| Unfair dismissal | C2 (Mrs Holland). The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because she had less than two years' continuous employment and said it did not have jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | C2 (Mrs Holland). The tribunal found unauthorised deductions because three weeks' wages were unpaid. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,396
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £246
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £82
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.