Case 1600780/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Callum French v Corinthian Access Limited (In Receivership) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600780/2024
- Decision date
- 16 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Callum French
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and did not attend. Employment Judge S Moore determined that a decision could properly be made on the papers. The judgment records that the claim was issued on 9 March 2024 and heard by video on 13 September 2024.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £500 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £3,000 in damages. The judgment states that this figure was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,750. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £290 gross. The total payable under the judgment was £5,540.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for notice after the tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; the figure was calculated using gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £290 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,540
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.