Case 1600781/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stephen Picton v Lizard Workwear and Safety Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) Heard by: CVP link — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600781/2020
- Decision date
- 14 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stephen Picton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 13 July 2020 before Employment Judge A Frazer, the respondent made no appearance. The tribunal held that Mr Stephen Picton's claims were well founded and that he was entitled to payment for unpaid wages, holiday pay, a redundancy payment and notice pay.
The remedy section records awards of £7,555.15 for redundancy payment, £145.00 for guarantee payment, £5,040.00 for notice pay, £170.70 for holiday pay and £3,119.94 for unpaid wages. The total award was £16,030.79. The judgment gives the remedy figures only and does not set out further reasoning beyond the finding that the claims succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awards this as 'unpaid wages'. | Upheld | — | £3,120 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £171 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,555 |
| Breach of contract | Mapped from the judgment's award for 'notice pay'. | Upheld | — | £5,040 |
| Other | Awarded separately as 'Guarantee payment' in the remedy section; the judgment does not give a further legal label. | Upheld | — | £145 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,031
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.