Case 1600783/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr C Jones (2) Mr M Williams v Kaefer Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600783/2018
- Decision date
- 19 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr C Jones (2) Mr M Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Jones and Mr M Williams brought a breach of contract claim against Kaefer Limited. The case was heard at Cardiff on 16 and 17 January 2019 before Employment Judge C K Sharp sitting alone.
The tribunal held that the claimants' breach of contract claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written judgment does not record any monetary award or split of remedy.
The judgment notes that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons were provided unless requested under the Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The extracted record contains no further findings on liability or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment states that the claimants' breach of contract claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons were provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.