Case 1600783/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs C Statham v UK Atlantis Ltd — 2023

Case reference: 1600783/2022
Decision date: 20 January 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Moore

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs C Statham

Respondent

UK Atlantis Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By letter dated 4 January 2023, the Tribunal gave UK Atlantis Ltd an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out. The Tribunal said the response should not be struck out because the Respondent had not complied with the Order dated 31 August 2022 and because the case had not been actively pursued.

The Respondent did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Moore struck out the response.

The judgment records that the Respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the claimant's claims or record any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment struck out the Respondent's response after the Tribunal's letter of 4 January 2023 gave the Respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. The reasons given were non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 31 August 2022 and that the matter had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.