Case 1600798/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wells v Fusion Electrical and Building Services Engineering Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600798/2021
- Decision date
- 9 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wells
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely at Cardiff on 8 November 2022 before Employment Judge R F Powell. The written judgment records that the claimant, Mr J Wells, was represented by Ms Quenby and the respondent, Fusion Electrical and Building Services Engineering Ltd, was represented by Mr Lyons.
The only substantive order recorded in the written reasons is that the claimant's application to amend his claim to add an allegation contrary to section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, in relation to his secondment on 13 October 2020, was granted. The judgment states that the tribunal's reasons were given orally during the hearing.
The written text supplied does not record any final determination of liability on the underlying claim, and it does not record any remedy or monetary award. It also states that written reasons may be requested by written application within fourteen days of the date of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The written judgment records only that the claimant's application to amend his claim to add an allegation contrary to section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, relating to his secondment on 13 October 2020, was granted. No merits determination of that allegation is recorded in the provided text. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.