Case 1600801/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Holdsworth v Portreset Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600801/2019
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z Holdsworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace decided the case on 20 August 2019 in the absence of an ET3 response form from Portreset Limited. The judgment records that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination, and under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 the judge upheld the listed claims.
The claims upheld were breach of contract and unfair dismissal. The judgment is expressly limited to liability only. No remedy figure was assessed in this decision, and the matter was listed to proceed to a separate remedy hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone, with a time estimate of one hour.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Upheld on liability only in the absence of an ET3 response from the respondent; remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld on liability only in the absence of an ET3 response from the respondent; remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.