Case 1600823/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Dunne v Lumina Investments Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600823/2019
- Decision date
- 12 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RL Brace
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Dunne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, at Cardiff on 8 October 2019 before Employment Judge RL Brace, found that Lumina Investments Limited had, in breach of section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, deducted from Mr J Dunne’s wages without his authorisation. The written record states that the deductions concerned the difference between the contractual gross monthly salary of £1,683.00 and the amounts actually paid in March 2019 and April 2019.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,197.00 for March 2019 and £474.10 for April 2019 in respect of the unlawful deductions. The written record states that the total amount payable is £1,671.00. It also records that Mr Dunne is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided in the record. The judgment is a short written record of decision sent to the parties on 12 October 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record says the respondent deducted the difference between the contractual gross monthly salary of £1,683.00 and the amounts paid in March 2019 and April 2019. It orders payment of £1,197.00 for March 2019 and £474.10 for April 2019, and states that the total payable is £1,671.00. | Upheld | — | £1,671 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,671
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.