Case 1600826/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gareth Nurse v Penclawdd Shellfish — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600826/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gareth Nurse
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace determined the case on the papers under Rule 21 because the respondent had not filed an ET3 response form and there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination. The judgment states that the claimant, Mr Gareth Nurse, succeeded on the claims identified in the order.
The tribunal upheld a redundancy pay claim in the sum of £10,710.00 and an unpaid wages claim in the sum of £1,403.64. The reasons for those awards are not set out in detail in the short written judgment, but the tribunal recorded that it was satisfied on the material before it to make the awards in the claimant's favour.
The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. No separate holiday pay award is listed, and no other claims or remedies are identified in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £10,710 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this head of claim as 'Unpaid Wages'; it does not separately list holiday pay, although the standard tax note mentions unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,404 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,114
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.