Case 1600827/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Power v Mathew Malley — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600827/2019
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Power
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered whether the claim should be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. By letters dated 8 August 2019 and 30 October 2019, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why strike out should not follow.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge S Davies ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment complaint or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after letters dated 8 August 2019 and 30 October 2019 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.