Case 1600844/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Dr P Richards v Office for National Statistics — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600844/2018
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Havard Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr P Richards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Dr P Richards brought claims against the Office for National Statistics. The matter was heard at Cardiff on 3 December 2019 before Employment Judge Havard, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms R Levene, counsel.
The unfair constructive dismissal claim, recorded under claim number 1601022/2019, was dismissed because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. The sex discrimination claim under claim number 1600844/2018 was withdrawn and was thereby dismissed. The victimisation claim under claim number 1600844/2018 was also withdrawn and was thereby dismissed.
The judgment does not record any monetary remedy, award, or costs order.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claim for unfair constructive dismissal, claim number 1601022/2019, was dismissed on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The sex discrimination claim, claim number 1600844/2018, was withdrawn and thereby dismissed. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claim, claim number 1600844/2018, was withdrawn and thereby dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.