Case 1600844/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Jeal v Mr A Pledger — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600844/2023
- Decision date
- 5 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Jeal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Cardiff on 4 September 2023 before Employment Judge C Sharp sitting alone. The claimant, Miss L Jeal, appeared in person with Mr T Knight as support. The respondent, Mr A Pledger, did not attend.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction from wages. It also dismissed the claim for failure to provide itemised pay statements. The reason given for both dismissals was that the respondent was not the claimant's employer.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the tribunal found the respondent was not the claimant's employer. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim for failure to provide itemised pay statements was dismissed because the tribunal found the respondent was not the claimant's employer. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.