Case 1600849/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Brackenbury v GB Nametapes Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600849/2023
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Brackenbury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. A letter dated 18 October 2023 had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The judgment records that the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The gov.uk listing category identifies breach of contract, but the short judgment does not separately describe this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The gov.uk listing category identifies redundancy, but the short judgment does not separately describe this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing category identifies unlawful deduction from wages, but the short judgment does not separately describe this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.