Case 1600854/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Gazzard v Natural Resources Wales — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600854/2019
- Decision date
- 10 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RL Brace
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Gazzard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at a preliminary hearing by CVP on 27 July 2020 and decided only the disability issue. The claimant had relied on depression and insomnia, and had not pursued the back pain mentioned in his ET1. The relevant period was treated as running from 2015 until his dismissal on 18 February 2019, because he alleged discriminatory treatment during suspension, the disciplinary process and the dismissal decision.
The tribunal reviewed GP and occupational health material and accepted that the claimant had periods of low mood and insomnia, including in 2015, 2016 and again from November 2017. It found, however, that the evidence did not show a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. The claimant’s impact statement said his decision-making, judgment, concentration and productivity were affected, but he gave no concrete examples and the tribunal found that this was not reflected in the medical records.
The tribunal also held that, even if there had been an impairment, the claimant had not shown that any adverse effect was long term. It noted a gap of about 14 months between September 2016 and November 2017 when there was no evidence of the claimed impairments affecting him, and concluded that the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010. The disability discrimination claims under s.15 and ss.20-21 were therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | s.15 EqA 2010 claim alleging dismissal because poor decision-making arose from depression and insomnia; dismissed after the tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person at the material time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | s.20 and s.21 EqA 2010 reasonable adjustments claim concerning the disciplinary procedure and dismissal; dismissed for the same reason. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Part 1 Sch 1 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office [1999] IRLR (EAT)
- Paterson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] IRLR 763 (EAT)
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd 2002 ICR 729 (EAT)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.