Case 1600856/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Homer v Mr K Jones — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600856/2023
- Decision date
- 22 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Homer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Cardiff by CVP on 17 August 2023 before Employment Judge R Brace. The Claimant was represented by Mr Waddingham, a friend, and the Respondent by Mr Lewis, a friend.
The judgment records that the complaint brought under section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. The tribunal declared that the complaint succeeded and ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £300 for unpaid wages for 30 and 31 March 2023.
The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint under section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and that the Respondent was ordered to pay £300 in respect of unpaid wages for 30 and 31 March 2023. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.