Case 1600864/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Smolinski v ND Care & Support Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600864/2022
- Decision date
- 12 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Smolinski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary stage, Employment Judge Sharp had made case management orders on 3 March 2023 requiring the claimant, Miss L Smolinski, within seven days of the order being sent, to explain her non-attendance at the preliminary hearing on 3 March 2023, explain why her mobile number was not functional, and say whether she objected to the proposed strike out of her claims.
The judgment records that the claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim.
No liability findings, remedy assessment, or monetary award were made in the judgment. The decision is therefore a strike out only, sent to the parties on 12 April 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not identify the substantive claims in the text provided, but the case listing categories supplied with the record indicate Public Interest Disclosure. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the substantive claims in the text provided, but the case listing categories supplied with the record indicate Unfair Dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.