Case 1600866/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Felinski v Ravenwood Holding Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600866/2023
- Decision date
- 20 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Felinski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Felinski, represented himself. The respondent, Ravenwood Holding Ltd, was absent and presented no response. The hearing took place in Wrexham by CVP on 18 September 2023 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan.
The tribunal held that the respondent failed to pay holiday pay due to the claimant at the end of his employment, which ended on or about 14 April 2023. The judgment therefore upheld the holiday pay claim and ordered the respondent to pay £1,313, subject to tax and National Insurance.
Written reasons were not provided because the reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made at the hearing or within 14 days after the written record was sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay holiday pay due at the end of the claimant's employment, which ended on or about 14 April 2023. The award was stated to be subject to tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,313 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,313
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.