Case 1600867/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S McAllister v Katrina Evans-Bevan — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600867/2023
- Decision date
- 17 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Hunt Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S McAllister
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought two claims: a failure to inform and consult under s.15 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, and a failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002. The tribunal held that both claims were presented out of time.
Because the claims were out of time, the tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to hear them. Both claims were dismissed and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Failure to inform and consult brought under s.15 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. The tribunal held the claim was presented out of time and that it did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars brought under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002. The tribunal held the claim was presented out of time and that it did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.