Case 1600879/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Beveridge v Caerphilly County Borough Council Heard: Remotely via Cloud Video Platform (administered from Cardiff) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600879/2020
- Decision date
- 11 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Beveridge
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the claimant’s complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages and unpaid holiday pay were dismissed upon withdrawal. No monetary award was made in relation to those complaints.
The complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were found not well-founded and were dismissed. The tribunal stated that this meant the respondent fairly and lawfully dismissed the claimant. The document is a short written record and does not set out the full oral reasons beyond that outcome.
No remedy was recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the complaint of unpaid holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Held not well-founded and dismissed; the tribunal said this meant the respondent fairly and lawfully dismissed the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Held not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.