Case 1600881/2022 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600881/2022
- Decision date
- 13 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms Y Neves, Mrs J Beard
Parties
1 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously dismissed the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim. It also dismissed the separate claim described in the judgment as discriminatory constructive unfair dismissal, finding that claim was not made out. No remedy was awarded on either dismissal claim.
The direct discrimination claim was found to have been brought out of time. The Tribunal decided it was not just and equitable to extend time, so it had no jurisdiction to consider that claim and struck it out. The Tribunal added that, in the alternative, the direct discrimination claim was not made out and would have been dismissed on the merits.
The remaining disability claims also failed. The Tribunal dismissed the claim for breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments and the claim of harassment by reason of disability. The judgment records no monetary award or remedy calculations.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal was not made out and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim of discriminatory constructive unfair dismissal was not made out and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination was brought out of time; the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time, so it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim and struck it out. In the alternative, the claim was dismissed on the merits. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim for breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments was not made out and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim of harassment by reason of disability was not made out and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.