Case 1600886/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Thomas v Harlech and Ardudwy Leisure Heard: Cardiff, by video — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600886/2023
- Decision date
- 1 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Thomas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss B Thomas brought an unfair dismissal claim against Harlech and Ardudwy Leisure. The case was heard at Cardiff by video on 30 and 31 October 2023 before Employment Judge S Jenkins, with the claimant represented by Mr A Cooper and the respondent represented by Mr L Fakunle, solicitor.
The tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The written record does not set out the detailed factual or legal reasoning, because the reasons were given orally at the hearing and the record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £10,683.75. No split between basic award, compensatory award, interest, or other heads of loss is provided in the written record supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded a single lump-sum award of £10,683.75. The written record provided no breakdown of the award, and reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Upheld | — | £10,684 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,684
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.