Case 1600891/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Flint v Conwy Town Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600891/2021
- Decision date
- 6 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Flint
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs N Flint’s case against Conwy Town Council was resolved by agreement rather than a merits decision. The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties.
To allow those terms to be carried into effect, the tribunal adjourned the matter until 16:00 on 30 June 2022. The written judgment stated that if neither party applied to restore the matter to the hearing list before that time and date, the claim would be treated as having been withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and would stand dismissed without further order.
The judgment does not record findings on liability, remedy, or any monetary award. It is a short disposal order only, signed by Regional Employment Judge Davies on 3 May 2022 and sent to the parties on 6 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties. It adjourned the matter to 16:00 on 30 June 2022 to allow those terms to be carried into effect, and stated that if the matter were not restored by then it would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties. It adjourned the matter to 16:00 on 30 June 2022 to allow those terms to be carried into effect, and stated that if the matter were not restored by then it would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.