Case 1600892/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Bowie Mr G Campbell Mr R Ansen Mrs S Lewis v South Wales Campers Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600892/2022
- Decision date
- 16 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Bowie Mr G Campbell Mr R Ansen Mrs S Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the unfair dismissal complaint at this stage. By letter dated 7 December 2022, it gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out, because they did not appear to have the two years' qualifying service required by s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Moore therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment records that the remaining claim or claims were to stay listed for a future preliminary hearing for case management.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimants did not have the two years' qualifying service required to bring an unfair dismissal claim under s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.