Case 1600894/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Ansen v South Wales Campers Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600894/2022
- Decision date
- 17 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Russell Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff via video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Ansen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing on 14 April 2023 and was not represented. The tribunal noted that the claim formed part of a multiple, that correspondence had been sent to the claimant at the address on the claim form, and that he had not responded to earlier directions, including a 7 December 2022 strike-out warning in respect of the unfair dismissal element and later letters asking him to clarify his surname and to provide documents and a witness statement.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that a strike-out warning was sent on 7 December 2022 in respect of the unfair dismissal element; the claimant did not respond and that element was struck out before the final hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written reasons do not separately analyse this head of claim, but the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend or be represented. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.