Case 1600900/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Evans v Llysywaun Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600900/2022
- Decision date
- 3 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Duncan Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Cardiff hearing on 2 March 2023, Employment Judge G Duncan, with no attendance from the Respondent, decided that Ms D Evans had been unfairly dismissed by Llysywaun Limited. The judgment records a basic award of £1,122 and a compensatory award of £9,638.22.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to pay notice pay, holiday entitlement and pension contributions, and ordered payment of £1,399, £527 and £552.49 respectively. It further awarded £500 for loss of statutory rights and a 25% ACAS uplift of £1,445.73. The total sum ordered was £15,184.44, and the claimant was held responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the holiday pay and notice pay elements.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that Ms D Evans had been unfairly dismissed. It ordered a basic award of £1,122 and a compensatory award of £9,638.22, and also awarded £500 for loss of statutory rights and a £1,445.73 ACAS uplift. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the Respondent had failed to pay notice pay, holiday entitlement and pension contributions, and ordered £1,399, £527 and £552.49 respectively. The judgment does not expressly label the legal cause of action for these sums beyond the failure-to-pay findings. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,184
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,122
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,638
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.