Case 1600903/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bradshaw v Bridger & Co Limited Trading as Bridger & Co. Solicitors — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600903/2019
- Decision date
- 13 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bradshaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 3 July 2019, the tribunal gave Mr M Bradshaw an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claim beyond the strike-out decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 because the claim had not been actively pursued. The tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 3 July 2019 to make representations or request a hearing, but no sufficient representations or hearing request were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.