Case 1600910/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Francis v Blackwood Finance Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600910/2019
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Francis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRespondent Blackwood Finance Limited presented a response stating that the claim was not contested. Employment Judge Harfield said there was sufficient material to make a proper determination and made a Rule 21 judgment on 12 September 2019, sent to the parties on 26 September 2019.
The tribunal upheld claims for arrears of pay, notice pay and a statutory redundancy payment. The judgment records arrears of pay as £842.00 gross and £1,142.00 gross, notice pay as £3,162.36 gross, and statutory redundancy payment as £6,324.72. The claimant was held responsible for tax due on the arrears of pay and notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text lists arrears of pay as two gross figures, £842.00 and £1,142.00; these are treated here as a single arrears-of-pay award. | Upheld | — | £1,984 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was upheld at £3,162.36 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,162 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment was upheld at £6,324.72. | Upheld | — | £6,325 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,471
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.