Case 1600911/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr William Britten v The Lion Hotel (Berriew) Limited — 2023

Case reference: 1600911/2022
Decision date: 26 April 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge J Bromige Representation
Venue: Welshpool ET

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr William Britten

Respondent

The Lion Hotel (Berriew) Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal held that the claimant's wrongful dismissal claim for notice pay succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay 1087.51 gross, calculated by reference to four weeks' notice pay at 615.38 gross per week, with credit given for sums already paid.

The Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages as not well founded. It also dismissed the breach of contract bonus claim and the holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Wrongful dismissal	The judgment describes this as wrongful dismissal (notice pay) and states the award is gross.	Upheld	—	£1,088
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment states the claim was not well founded and was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	The judgment describes this as a breach of contract bonus claim and dismisses it.	Dismissed	—	—
Holiday pay	The judgment states the holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,088; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.