Case 1600914/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss U Dierstein v Conveyancing Direct Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600914/2023
- Decision date
- 30 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Brady Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss U Dierstein
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing, the tribunal decided the issue of disability under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. It found that Miss Dierstein had a physical impairment, cervical vertigo, which had been ongoing since June 2021 and had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities. In reaching that conclusion, the tribunal accepted evidence of dizziness, disorientation, neck pain, stiffness, headaches and balance problems, and noted that she had sought medical treatment, carried out exercises and bought ergonomic office equipment.
The tribunal accepted her explanation of the physiotherapy note of 16 March 2023 and found that her neck problems were causing her dizziness on that date. It also referred to the earlier hospital admission on 29 June 2021, the later diagnosis of cervical vertigo on 2 June 2023, and the fact that the condition had persisted despite attempts to alleviate it. On that basis, the tribunal held that cervical vertigo was a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal further found that anxiety and depression were a disability from 1 June 2023 onwards. Although the first fit note referring to the condition was dated 13 October 2023, it accepted that she had been receiving cognitive behavioural therapy from June 2023 and that the condition was ongoing and likely to continue. The judgment was limited to the preliminary disability issue and did not determine the merits of any discrimination complaint or make any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Public preliminary hearing on disability status only. The tribunal found the claimant was disabled by reason of cervical vertigo from 29 June 2021 and by reason of anxiety and depression from 1 June 2023 onwards, but did not determine liability for the underlying discrimination complaints. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.