Case 1600915/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Tinton v Penn Pharmaceutical Services Limited t/a PCI Pharma Services — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600915/2021
- Decision date
- 10 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Tinton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr J Tinton's complaint of age discrimination. By letter dated 21 September 2021, the Tribunal had given him an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why that complaint should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success and that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 21 September 2021.
The reasons recorded that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The complaint of age discrimination was therefore struck out. The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining claim(s) stayed listed for hearing on 15 November 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The Tribunal struck out the age discrimination complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 21 September 2021 to make representations or request a hearing. The reasons stated that the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 21 September 2021. | Struck out | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.