Case 1600917/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Manka v Luiza Davey — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600917/2019
- Decision date
- 3 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Manka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Harfield determined the claim in the absence of any ET3 response, stating that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment upheld two monetary claims: unpaid holiday pay of £725.73 gross and arrears of pay of £179.75 gross.
The judgment does not give further reasoning beyond the Rule 21 basis for deciding the matter on the papers. It records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The total awarded from the two gross sums was £905.48.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded as unpaid holiday pay, stated to be gross. | Upheld | — | £726 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as arrears of pay, stated to be gross. | Upheld | — | £180 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £905
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.