Case 1600921/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Thomas v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600921/2024
- Decision date
- 22 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webb Representation
- Venue
- Employment Tribunal Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Thomas applied for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against Tesco Stores Ltd. The application was heard at Employment Tribunal Cardiff on 19 April 2024 before Employment Judge Webb, with the claimant representing himself and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal refused the application for interim relief. The written record does not set out substantive reasons, because reasons were given orally at the hearing and the note states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
No monetary award was made in the decision record provided, and no separate remedy figures are recorded. The only outcome stated in the judgment is the refusal of interim relief.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was refused at the hearing on 19 April 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.