Case 1600922/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Leon Hogan T/a Hogan’s Bar & Grill — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600922/2019
- Decision date
- 25 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Beard Date-
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Thomas brought claims against Leon Hogan t/a Hogan’s Bar & Grill for breach of contract, pleaded as failure to pay notice pay, and for unlawful deduction of wages. The respondent did not appear. The tribunal sat in Swansea on 24 October 2019 before Employment Judge W Beard sitting alone.
The breach of contract claim was dismissed. The judgment records that the claim for failure to pay notice pay was not well founded.
The unlawful deduction of wages claim succeeded. The tribunal found that the respondent owed the claimant outstanding holiday pay for 1.5 days at £57.47 per day and 140 hours of unpaid wages at £86.21 gross, producing a subtotal of £1,235.61 gross.
From that subtotal, the tribunal deducted £50 already paid by the respondent and ordered payment of a total award of £1,185.61.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was pleaded as failure to pay notice pay. The tribunal found it was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim and awarded the claimant £1,185.61 after calculating outstanding holiday pay and unpaid wages, then deducting £50 already paid by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,186 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,186
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.