Case 1600923/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Furley v Coal Exchange Operations LLP t/a The Coal Exchange Hotel — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600923/2023
- Decision date
- 6 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Furley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cardiff (CVP) on 2 November 2023, Employment Judge R Evans heard the claim brought by Miss C Furley against Coal Exchange Operations LLP t/a The Coal Exchange Hotel. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr A Williams of Peninsula.
The tribunal dismissed both claims. It held that the claimant’s claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded, and it also held that the claim for unpaid wages was not well-founded. No separate monetary award was made in the judgment.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s usual procedure. The judgment therefore records the outcomes only, without further written findings on the evidence or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for 'constructive unfair dismissal' and says it was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for 'unpaid wages' and says it was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.