Case 1600924/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Chatha v I4 TG Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600924/2023
- Decision date
- 3 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Chatha
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages during the period October 2021 to January 2023.
The judgment records that the respondent did not appear or be represented at the hearing in Cardiff, which took place by video on 2 October 2023. The claimant was represented by Mr G Chatha.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £65,635.29, subject to account being taken for any tax and national insurance previously deducted and for any further tax and national insurance that may be due. The accompanying note states that the claimant had received payments of £59,529 for the relevant period, ostensibly net of tax and national insurance, but that enquiries made of HMRC did not record deductions being paid over in relation to her. It adds that if such sums had in fact been paid, they would need to be taken into account and deducted from the amount ordered.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £65,635.29, subject to tax and national insurance already deducted and any further tax and national insurance due. The note records that the claimant had received £59,529 for the relevant period and that HMRC enquiries did not show deductions being paid over, though any such sums would need to be taken into account if they had been paid. | Upheld | — | £65,635 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £65,635
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.