Vol. I·6 May 2026

Search the index

Loading…

Loading page content.

Tribunal Watch

A structured, cross-cut index of UK employment tribunal decisions, built from the primary record at gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Independent of HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice.

Not legal advice. Information on this site is a matter of public record; it is not guidance on any individual case.

Editorial

About this site
Methodology
Corrections policy
Editorial standards

Rights & privacy

Open Government Licence v3.0
Privacy notice
Data subject requests
Atom feed (recent decisions)

Ms R George v Cariad Domiciliary Support Services Ltd Kari Anne Bailey Key Group Services Ltd Angharad Warner Chris Beckingham-Paul Steve Barrett Lucy Williams — Employment Tribunal 2023 | Tribunal Watch

Tribunal Watch/Cariad Domiciliary Support Services Ltd Kari Anne Bailey Key Group Services Ltd Angharad Warner Chris Beckingham-Paul Steve Barrett Lucy Williams/1600929/2023

Case 1600929/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Ms R George v Cariad Domiciliary Support Services Ltd Kari Anne Bailey Key Group Services Ltd Angharad Warner Chris Beckingham-Paul Steve Barrett Lucy Williams — 2023

Case reference: 1600929/2023
Decision date: 2 October 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Venue: Cardiff

Indexed: 30 April 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms R George

Respondent

Cariad Domiciliary Support Services Ltd Kari Anne Bailey Key Group Services Ltd Angharad Warner Chris Beckingham-Paul Steve Barrett Lucy Williams

Claims brought

1 category

Disability discrimination

Source tags (gov.uk)

Disability Discrimination

Outcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.

Source document

Primary record

The full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Judgment 1 (PDF) ↗

Judgment 2 (PDF) ↗

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.